Dr. Who's Reading Room

More evidence of the militarization of our police.

Matthis Chiroux

Posted: 11/17/11 04:51 PM ET

The NYPD are up to something a little more vile and tricky than ordering baton-wielding police goons to charge recklessly up Manhattan streets, beating every man, woman and child in their path. ‘Snatch and Grab’ operations are currently being employed against Occupy Wall Street protesters in Zuccotti Park.

“They keep pushing into the crowd in formations, grabbing people, and then withdrawing,” said Eric, a college student who wished not to share his last name, from Zuccotti Park over the phone. “They’ve done it three more times since you left.”

During the police operations he spoke of, Eric was struck in the groin, pushed to the ground and cracked across the shin with a nightstick. “I had my open hands in the air the whole time,” he said. ” I wasn’t threatening anyone. They just beat everyone unfortunate enough to be around this one guy until they drug him out.”

These operations do not strike me as random. What the police are engaging in looks like a military crowd control tactic called ‘snatch and grab,’ something I practiced in training on various occasions in the military. It consists of a dual process of intelligence gathering and target extraction. Leaders or agitators within the crowd are identified, after which a line of soldiers, usually in a diamond wedge, push into the crowd so that one or two soldiers in the rear can grab the identified agitators and remove them, thus ripening a crowd for dispersal. Often times, cameras are used to identify potential targets.

As a veteran of street demonstrations in New York, I’m no stranger to police surveillance at protests. However, this morning was the first time I felt these cameras were part of a real-time tactical strategy.

read more



 


It is safe to assume that PFC Manning, who is now incarcerated and facing numerous charges, is the same person who released these documents. We need to recognize that Manning did not simply wake up one morning and begin collecting data (nor can I find any evidence that he is profiting materially from his disclosure). He faced a crisis of conscience over knowing certain truths and being told to “shut up” about what he discovered. He is, by all intents and purposes, a whistleblower. There are laws in place to protect his actions, but since he is a service member, let’s just go ahead and forget about that.

Here is what I don’t get: What is empowering our enemies more — the fact that the events being described are occurring (which, by the way, insurgents in Afghanistan don’t need Manning to tell them), or that an American service member, charged with protecting our Constitutive principles, has wrestled the truth to the fore? What is being endangered more — military members who are aware of and accept the great burden of martial conduct, or the political ambition of military brass and the reputation of a particular administration? This top-heavy defensive posturing is not without precedent of course. Wasn’t a certain General ‘allowed’ to resign for conduct exponentially worse than that of a Lieutenant who eventually faced no less than two courts-martial?

Logan Mehl-Laituri, Veteran “Wikileaks, Truth Tellers, and a Crisis of Conscience | Iraq Veterans Against the War

(*Originally posted, with hyperlinks, on July 27th at Sojourners’ blog “God’s Politics”:http://blog.sojo.net/2010/07/27/wikileaks-truth-tellers-and-a-crisis-of-…)



 


Like Col. Ann Wright (ret.), another veteran for peace.

Joe Meadors was on one of the other Free Gaza boats that was seized early Monday morning. For Meadors, this marks the second time he has been aboard a ship attacked by Israeli forces in international waters. In 1967, Meadors was a signalman aboard the USS Liberty, a US Navy electronic intelligence-gathering ship that was attacked by Israeli planes and torpedo boats in 1967. Thirty-four Americans were killed and more than 170 were wounded in the attack.

watch