Dr. Who's Reading Room
If GMOs are so safe, why resist labeling them? Let the consumers decide and “educate” us if you think that’s necessary.
As the battle to get genetically engineered foods (or GMOs) labeled in California — a battle that could very well have an impact on labeling nationwide — heats up, Big Food and Big Ag are working in concert to push back to the tune of $25 million. The fight centers around Proposition 37, the ballot initiative from the Right to Know Campaign that will go to vote in November. (via These companies don’t want GMOs labeled in California | Grist)

If GMOs are so safe, why resist labeling them? Let the consumers decide and “educate” us if you think that’s necessary.

As the battle to get genetically engineered foods (or GMOs) labeled in California — a battle that could very well have an impact on labeling nationwide — heats up, Big Food and Big Ag are working in concert to push back to the tune of $25 million. The fight centers around Proposition 37, the ballot initiative from the Right to Know Campaign that will go to vote in November. (via These companies don’t want GMOs labeled in California | Grist)


 


If the GOP really believed in the free market, they wouldn’t need to sneak in this industry protectionism… and GMOs would fall of their own weight like a house of cards. Consumers do not want Frankenfoods. I guess it’s the GMOP now.

shhhApparently it wasn’t quite enough for the House Agriculture Committee to pass a version of the farm bill that made over $16 billion in cuts to food stamps and allowed for an open-ended expansion of crop insurance for Big Ag.

No, the members of the committee also felt the need to sneak something in to help out those poor struggling biotechnology behemoths in their attempts to win approval for new genetically engineered seed. Since we all know genetically modified seeds never win approval. I’m sorry. Did I say never? I meant always.

But apparently an unending winning streak isn’t enough for the biotech industry. It wants to make sure that the U.S. Department of Agriculture approves its new seeds with minimal study, and loses the ability to withdraw them from the market should they prove harmful. To top it off, biotech companies want to ensure that anyone harmed by these seeds will have no recourse for damages.*

Such a provision was slipped into the farm bill at the last minute. It would eliminate the liability biotech companies may have and effectively lift all regulations on genetically modified seeds. The provision bears a strong similarity to one that was added to the annual agriculture spending bill now working its way through the House (the one activist group Food Democracy Now! has dubbed the Monsanto Protection Act).

read more



 


Not many consumers realize that the FDA does not require genetically modified food to be labeled. That’s because the FDA has decided that you, dear consumer, don’t care if the tomato you’re eating has been cross bred with frog genes to render the tomato more resistant to cold weather. Some consumers may not be concerned with eating Frankenfood, but for those who are, here’s how to determine if the fruits and vegetables you’re buying are (GM) genetically modified. Hat tip to Marion Owen for her valuable information. Here’s how it works:
For conventionally grown fruit, (grown with chemicals inputs), the PLU code on the sticker consists of four numbers. 
Organically grown fruit has a five-numeral PLU prefaced by the number 9. 
Genetically engineered (GM) fruit has a five-numeral PLU prefaced by the number 8. 
For example:
A conventionally grown banana would be: 4011 
An organic banana would be: 94011 
A genetically engineered (GE or GMO) banana would be: 84011 
(via How To I.D. Genetically Modified Food at the Supermarket)

Not many consumers realize that the FDA does not require genetically modified food to be labeled. That’s because the FDA has decided that you, dear consumer, don’t care if the tomato you’re eating has been cross bred with frog genes to render the tomato more resistant to cold weather. Some consumers may not be concerned with eating Frankenfood, but for those who are, here’s how to determine if the fruits and vegetables you’re buying are (GM) genetically modified. Hat tip to Marion Owen for her valuable information. Here’s how it works:

  • For conventionally grown fruit, (grown with chemicals inputs), the PLU code on the sticker consists of four numbers. 
  • Organically grown fruit has a five-numeral PLU prefaced by the number 9. 
  • Genetically engineered (GM) fruit has a five-numeral PLU prefaced by the number 8. 

For example:

  • A conventionally grown banana would be: 4011 
  • An organic banana would be: 94011 
  • A genetically engineered (GE or GMO) banana would be: 84011 

(via How To I.D. Genetically Modified Food at the Supermarket)



 


patiofarmer:

weebeasties:

“We must occupy the food system to create food democracy.” —Dr. Vandana Shiva, Physicist & Seed Activist http://bit.ly/wtIaxY
Please REBLOG if you want to spread the word that it’s time to take back our food supply from reckless corporations like Monsanto & Cargill and build healthy, just, sustainable food systems that work for us all.


I agree. 100%.

patiofarmer:

weebeasties:

“We must occupy the food system to create food democracy.” —Dr. Vandana Shiva, Physicist & Seed Activist http://bit.ly/wtIaxY

Please REBLOG if you want to spread the word that it’s time to take back our food supply from reckless corporations like Monsanto & Cargill and build healthy, just, sustainable food systems that work for us all.


I agree. 100%.



 


For all that is good and honorable in our food system, we should not cut off the nose to spite the face. Indeed, big agribusiness is problematic here as are GMOs (greedily modified organisms) such as Bt corn.

Anyone who’s been stung by a bee knows they can inflict an outsized pain for such tiny insects. It makes a strange kind of sense, then, that their demise would create an outsized problem for the food system by placing the more than 70 crops they pollinate — from almonds to apples to blueberries — in peril.
Although news about Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has died down, commercial beekeepers have seen average population losses of about 30 percent each year since 2006, said Paul Towers, of the Pesticide Action Network. Towers was one of the organizers of a conference that brought together beekeepers and environmental groups this week to tackle the challenges facing the beekeeping industry and the agricultural economy by proxy.
“We are inching our way toward a critical tipping point,” said Steve Ellis, secretary of the National Honey Bee Advisory Board (NHBAB) and a beekeeper for 35 years. Last year he had so many abnormal bee die-offs that he’ll qualify for disaster relief from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
In addition to continued reports of CCD — a still somewhat mysterious phenomenon in which entire bee colonies literally disappear, alien-abduction style, leaving not even their dead bodies behind — bee populations are suffering poor health in general, and experiencing shorter life spans and diminished vitality. And while parasites, pathogens, and habitat loss can deal blows to bee health, research increasingly points to pesticides as the primary culprit.
“In the industry we believe pesticides play an important role in what’s going on,” said Dave Hackenberg, co-chair of the NHBAB and a beekeeper in Pennsylvania.
Of particular concern is a group of pesticides, chemically similar to nicotine, called neonicotinoids (neonics for short), and one in particular called clothianidin. Instead of being sprayed, neonics are used to treat seeds, so that they’re absorbed by the plant’s vascular system, and then end up attacking the central nervous systems of bees that come to collect pollen. Virtually all of today’s genetically engineered Bt corn is treated with neonics. The chemical industry alleges that bees don’t like to collect corn pollen, but new research shows that not only do bees indeed forage in corn, but they also have multiple other routes of exposure to neonics.
The Purdue University study, published in the journal PLoS ONE, found high levels of clothianidin in planter exhaust spewed during the spring sowing of treated maize seed. It also found neonics in the soil of unplanted fields nearby those planted with Bt corn, on dandelions growing near those fields, in dead bees found near hive entrances, and in pollen stored in the hives.
Evidence already pointed to the presence of neonic-contaminated pollen as a factor in CCD. As Hackenberg explained, “The insects start taking [the pesticide] home, and it contaminates everywhere the insect came from.” These new revelations about the pervasiveness of neonics in bees’ habitats only strengthen the case against using the insecticides.
[…]
Unfortunately, it was the EPA itself that green-lit clothianidin and other neonics for commercial use, despite its own scientists’ clear warnings about the chemicals’ effects on bees and other pollinators. That doesn’t bode well for the chances of getting neonics off the market now, even in light of the Purdue study’s findings.

(via Honeybee problem nearing a ‘critical point’ | Grist)

For all that is good and honorable in our food system, we should not cut off the nose to spite the face. Indeed, big agribusiness is problematic here as are GMOs (greedily modified organisms) such as Bt corn.

Anyone who’s been stung by a bee knows they can inflict an outsized pain for such tiny insects. It makes a strange kind of sense, then, that their demise would create an outsized problem for the food system by placing the more than 70 crops they pollinate — from almonds to apples to blueberries — in peril.

Although news about Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) has died down, commercial beekeepers have seen average population losses of about 30 percent each year since 2006, said Paul Towers, of the Pesticide Action Network. Towers was one of the organizers of a conference that brought together beekeepers and environmental groups this week to tackle the challenges facing the beekeeping industry and the agricultural economy by proxy.

“We are inching our way toward a critical tipping point,” said Steve Ellis, secretary of the National Honey Bee Advisory Board (NHBAB) and a beekeeper for 35 years. Last year he had so many abnormal bee die-offs that he’ll qualify for disaster relief from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

In addition to continued reports of CCD — a still somewhat mysterious phenomenon in which entire bee colonies literally disappear, alien-abduction style, leaving not even their dead bodies behind — bee populations are suffering poor health in general, and experiencing shorter life spans and diminished vitality. And while parasites, pathogens, and habitat loss can deal blows to bee health, research increasingly points to pesticides as the primary culprit.

“In the industry we believe pesticides play an important role in what’s going on,” said Dave Hackenberg, co-chair of the NHBAB and a beekeeper in Pennsylvania.

Of particular concern is a group of pesticides, chemically similar to nicotine, called neonicotinoids (neonics for short), and one in particular called clothianidin. Instead of being sprayed, neonics are used to treat seeds, so that they’re absorbed by the plant’s vascular system, and then end up attacking the central nervous systems of bees that come to collect pollen. Virtually all of today’s genetically engineered Bt corn is treated with neonics. The chemical industry alleges that bees don’t like to collect corn pollen, but new research shows that not only do bees indeed forage in corn, but they also have multiple other routes of exposure to neonics.

The Purdue University study, published in the journal PLoS ONE, found high levels of clothianidin in planter exhaust spewed during the spring sowing of treated maize seed. It also found neonics in the soil of unplanted fields nearby those planted with Bt corn, on dandelions growing near those fields, in dead bees found near hive entrances, and in pollen stored in the hives.

Evidence already pointed to the presence of neonic-contaminated pollen as a factor in CCD. As Hackenberg explained, “The insects start taking [the pesticide] home, and it contaminates everywhere the insect came from.” These new revelations about the pervasiveness of neonics in bees’ habitats only strengthen the case against using the insecticides.

[…]

Unfortunately, it was the EPA itself that green-lit clothianidin and other neonics for commercial use, despite its own scientists’ clear warnings about the chemicals’ effects on bees and other pollinators. That doesn’t bode well for the chances of getting neonics off the market now, even in light of the Purdue study’s findings.

(via Honeybee problem nearing a ‘critical point’ | Grist)



 


GMO Salmon
I like mohandasgandhi’s commentary on this issue and see nothing to add to it, really.
mohandasgandhi:

dominickbrady:

There are a lot of issues surrounding this and I’m pretty certain that the FDA will drop the ball again.  The issue of wild fisheries being dead in 20 years is real.  We can’t get away from that.  Instead of finding methods to fish in a more sustainable manner, we’ve got this short cut.
uzairm:

Two  same-age salmon, one a genetically modified salmon (rear), the other a  non-genetically modified salmon (foreground) appear in this photo  provided by AquaBounty Technologies. The U.S. Food and Drug  Administration has recently been studying whether to approve marketing a  genetically engineered animal as safe for people to eat. (AP  Photo/AquaBounty Technologies)
Hat Tip: The Big Picture


I don’t particularly care whether these salmon are safe to eat or not.  This isn’t going to solve the problem of overfishing.  Genetically modifying an animal to meet our rate of over-consumption is unsustainable itself. 
I don’t think the path the environmental sustainability is to tweak it with science and technology so it becomes suitable for us to use to our benefit in order to sustain human life.  We do not need to be adapting Earth to us, WE need to be adapting to Earth.  
We drown our vegetation in pesticides and fertilizer so it grows faster, we pump cattle and poultry full of hormones and antibiotics so they grow faster, we add “vitamins” to our sugar water because it’s too difficult for us to eat healthy unless it tastes good, and we wonder what the problem is. 
Why is my planet warming?  Why is my child getting sick from drinking bottled water?  Why is Russia on fire?  Why can’t I breathe when I go outside?  Why am I getting sick all the time?  Why is there oil on my beach?  Where are the butterflies and flowers?  Why don’t the birds sing in the morning anymore?
We need to start treating the Earth with respect. It will respect us back.

GMO Salmon

I like mohandasgandhi’s commentary on this issue and see nothing to add to it, really.

mohandasgandhi:

dominickbrady:

There are a lot of issues surrounding this and I’m pretty certain that the FDA will drop the ball again.  The issue of wild fisheries being dead in 20 years is real.  We can’t get away from that.  Instead of finding methods to fish in a more sustainable manner, we’ve got this short cut.

uzairm:

Two same-age salmon, one a genetically modified salmon (rear), the other a non-genetically modified salmon (foreground) appear in this photo provided by AquaBounty Technologies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently been studying whether to approve marketing a genetically engineered animal as safe for people to eat. (AP Photo/AquaBounty Technologies)

Hat Tip: The Big Picture

I don’t particularly care whether these salmon are safe to eat or not.  This isn’t going to solve the problem of overfishing.  Genetically modifying an animal to meet our rate of over-consumption is unsustainable itself. 

I don’t think the path the environmental sustainability is to tweak it with science and technology so it becomes suitable for us to use to our benefit in order to sustain human life.  We do not need to be adapting Earth to us, WE need to be adapting to Earth.  

We drown our vegetation in pesticides and fertilizer so it grows faster, we pump cattle and poultry full of hormones and antibiotics so they grow faster, we add “vitamins” to our sugar water because it’s too difficult for us to eat healthy unless it tastes good, and we wonder what the problem is. 

Why is my planet warming?  Why is my child getting sick from drinking bottled water?  Why is Russia on fire?  Why can’t I breathe when I go outside?  Why am I getting sick all the time?  Why is there oil on my beach?  Where are the butterflies and flowers?  Why don’t the birds sing in the morning anymore?

We need to start treating the Earth with respect. It will respect us back.