Dr. Who's Reading Room
I also like that in this scene, Marilyn Manson said we should listen to youth.
other-stuff:


Michael Moore: Do you know that on the day of the Columbine massacre, the US dropped more bombs on Kosovo than any other day?  Marilyn Manson: I do know that, and I think that’s really ironic, that nobody said ‘well  maybe the President had an influence on this violent behavior’ Because  that’s not the way the media wants to take it and spin it, and turn it  into fear, because then you’re watching television, you’re watching the  news, you’re being pumped full of fear, there’s floods, there’s AIDS,  there’s murder, cut to commercial, buy the Acura, buy the Colgate, if  you have bad breath they’re not going to talk to you, if you have  pimples, the girl’s not going to fuck you, and it’s just this campaign  of fear, and consumption, and that’s what I think it’s all based on, the  whole idea of ‘keep everyone afraid, and they’ll consume.’

Thinking that national policy and behaviour does not have an effect on us is willful blindness

I also like that in this scene, Marilyn Manson said we should listen to youth.

other-stuff:

Michael Moore: Do you know that on the day of the Columbine massacre, the US dropped more bombs on Kosovo than any other day?
Marilyn Manson: I do know that, and I think that’s really ironic, that nobody said ‘well maybe the President had an influence on this violent behavior’ Because that’s not the way the media wants to take it and spin it, and turn it into fear, because then you’re watching television, you’re watching the news, you’re being pumped full of fear, there’s floods, there’s AIDS, there’s murder, cut to commercial, buy the Acura, buy the Colgate, if you have bad breath they’re not going to talk to you, if you have pimples, the girl’s not going to fuck you, and it’s just this campaign of fear, and consumption, and that’s what I think it’s all based on, the whole idea of ‘keep everyone afraid, and they’ll consume.’

Thinking that national policy and behaviour does not have an effect on us is willful blindness



 


Michael Moore on whom to thank for the Occupy movement.



 


OLBERMANN: I wanted to ask you about that. Is that -- because Oakland has rolled up, Albany was rolled up, Portland was rolled up, New York has been rolled up. MOORE: And all in the same way.
OLBERMANN: And poor Jean Quan, the mayor of Oakland -- who is like a weather vane in a windstorm out there -- admitting she was on a conference call with 18 mayors. This is a plan. Whose plan is it? And who do we assign responsibility to?
MOORE: Well, there was just a piece that came out from The Minneapolis Examiner a couple hours ago, where they quote a justice official in the Obama Justice Department who did not want to be identified, but he said that the federal government has been providing logistical and tactical advice and support. They said that it's up to the local law enforcement officers or agencies as to what, you know, what to do. But Homeland Security and the Justice Department have been coordinating the, sort of, advice and strategy and tactics of this so that -- because you have seen all of the tactics of the police have been the same in every city in terms of how they have done this in the last 48 hours. So, this is not some coincidence. This was planned. And I think that the question really has to be asked of the federal government, and of the Obama administration -- why?
OLBERMANN: Yeah.
MOORE: Why? Why are you participating in this, against a non-violent, mass movement of people who are upset at what Wall Street and the banks have done to their lives?
OLBERMANN: Conveniently, the president can't be asked that question, because he was en route to Australia. On the plane -- Air Force One -- the Associated Press quoted the press secretary. And this is their story -- they don't have direct quotes from the press secretary -- but he said, in essence, "The president hopes the right balance can be reached between protecting freedom of assembly and speech," -- Okay -- "with the need to uphold order and safeguard public health and safety." Because, obviously, the bubonic plague in all the Occupy protests was beginning to get to be a problem when we lost the entire state of Minnesota, or whatever he thinks happened. And, they added this in the story, "The administration's position is that each municipality has to make its own decisions about how to handle the issues." So, Mr. Obama is basically saying -- what? -- through his press secretary here? "You are on your own?"
MOORE: Yes. But he is also saying -- he wants it both ways.
OLBERMANN: Uh-huh.
MOORE: You know, his administration is obviously helping them to stymie this movement, because -- look, no politician, regardless of what party they are in, wants the people to suddenly be in charge.
OLBERMANN: Yeah.
MOORE: For the power to shift from those who are the elected officials to the people who elected them -- which is actually the way it's supposed to be -- that's a frightening thought.
OLBERMANN: Very much so.
MOORE: So, I can understand why they are inclined to do that. They are no different than any other politician, but because of all of, you know, my support of President Obama -- I expect more of him. And I don't expect his Justice Department and his Homeland Security Department to be helping to coordinate the destruction of this movement, because -- first of all, you can't destroy it. So stop, because the majority of Americans want taxes raised on the rich. The majority of Americans don't believe you didn't go far enough on health care. You know, you go down the whole list and the majority is very much behind the principles of the Occupy movement.
OLBERMANN: And the practicalities of it. There is a poll this afternoon -- New York State Public Opinion Poll -- 58 percent of New York State residents -- that's from Albany to Zuccotti Park, A to Z -- say that, no matter how they feel about what's being protested, the protesters have the right to continue to protest and they have the right to stay overnight in public parks. So, not just the, "Well, they're against Wall Street," or "They are communists," but just the idea they have the right to be there is overwhelmingly supported in the state in which this is now most recently happened.
MOORE: That is correct. And I believe that you would find that in most states across the country.
OLBERMANN: I think you are right.
MOORE: Because -- because people are just happy that somebody has started this. Somebody has gotten up and, again -- thank God that it's been young people that have said, "You have stolen our future and we want it back and we are not going to settle for anything less."


 


Dr. King, whose life was spent preaching unconditional love and nonviolent redemptive good, continues to inspire people the world over who are helping to shape his vision of an “arc of the moral universe” that is long but bends toward justice. Gandhi, King, Mandela—there are precious few whose legacies resonate with those who are risking their lives today, in a nonviolent fashion, to eliminate the evils of racism, poverty, militarism and environmental destruction. King’s tribute to global peacemakers should have reached out to them as the legitimate heirs of the King legacy, not the monied interests who helped pay for the piece of carved granite that bears his image.
Medea Benjamin, “No Way to Honor Dr. King” | MichaelMoore.com August 26th, 2011 11:06 AM


 


America is not broke. Contrary to what those in power would like you to believe, so that you’ll give up your pension, cut your wages, and settle for the life your great-grandparents had, America is not broke. Not by a long shot. The country is awash in wealth and cash. It’s just that it’s not in your hands. It has been transferred, in the greatest heist in history, from the workers and consumers to the banks and the portfolios of the uber-rich.

Right now, this afternoon, just 400 Americans—400—have more wealth than half of all Americans combined. Let me say that again. And please, someone in the mainstream media, just repeat this fact once. We’re not greedy; we’ll be happy to hear it just once. Four hundred obscenely wealthy individuals, 400 little Mubaraks, most of whom benefited in some way from the multi-trillion-dollar taxpayer bailout of 2008, now have more cash, stock and property than the assets of 155 million Americans combined.



 


Walker’s stance is so outrageous it invites this kind of response.

It’s important to note that this is just a threat and not actually going out on a general strike. Under the Taft-Hartley Act a general strike in support of other workers is illegal; therefore the key word is the phrase “begin educating affiliates and members on the organization and function of a general strike”. In addition, only individual unions, not the central labor federation has the ability to call a strike.

Many private sector unions would not go out on a general strike out of fear of being of sued by their employers. However, local labor observers say many public sector unions and some of the construction unions would go out on a strike. Threatening a general strike creates even more pressure for Scott Walker in the business community.  The business community in Wisconsin already appears to bucking under the intense pressure of the mass labor mobilization as I noted here last week.



 


Wells Fargo and U.S. Bancorp have lost a major court case in Massachusetts that could have profound effects on how foreclosure cases proceed nationwide. The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts voided the seizure of two homes by the banks because the banks had “failed to make the required showing that they were the holders of the mortgages at the time of foreclosure.” Associate Justice Robert Cordy declared that the banks demonstrated “utter carelessness” in documenting their rights to the properties. The short-term effects of the decision are that Mark and Tammy LaRace will be able to stay in their home, despite the fact that it was foreclosed upon in 2007, and Antonio Ibanez will have the title of his home returned to him. If the bank will not allow him to retake possession of the home, then it will have to pay him for his deed. The decision was applied retroactively, meaning thousands of homeowners could seek recovery for homes that were wrongfully foreclosed upon. Analysts worry, however, about the economic costs of the decision, suggesting that it could make selling homes more difficult.

Wells Fargo & U.S. Bancorp Lose Landmark Foreclosure Court Case Democracy Now! | Headlines for January 10, 2011

This is one of those days I love my home state. Michael Moore was right, “stay in your homes.” Wells Fargo is probably the most abusive, racist, redlining lender. And those seeking redress of grievances? There’s a lot you can accomplish before giving up on the law.

 


 


1. Is Hillary Clinton building a secret army of Ban Ki-moon clones?

[…]

2. Do the King of Saudi Arabia and Glenn Beck share a speechwriter with Saddam Hussein?

[…]

3. Why are Iranians so unbelievably paranoid?

[…]

4. Are Iranians a completely different species from Americans?

[…]

5. When did the U.S. government decide to buy keyboards that WEREN’T ALL UPPER CASE?

[…]

Michael Moore, Five Questions the Mainstream Media Won’t Ask About the Wikileaks Release | MichaelMoore.com November 30th, 2010 10:22 AM

Leave it to Moore to find the black comedy in our foreign policy.



 


AMY GOODMAN: And Michael Moore, your assessment of the new House Speaker, John Boehner?
MICHAEL MOORE: I think, just wind him up and let him loose. Let people—the 55 to 60 percent who didn’t vote today will get a good taste of what he’s about. More than likely, they will do themselves in, because they will overreach in such a profound way.


 


Yes, it is their fault for trying to play the Tea Party off against their own Frat Party of the Bush years, and in the process, picking someone ignorant of the First Amendment.

Jillian Rayfield | November 3, 2010, 10:41AM

 Christine O’Donnell has wasted no time finding a scapegoat for her loss last night to Democrat Chris Coons in Delaware’s Senate Race — and it’s the establishment GOP that didn’t give her enough support. Calling it “Republican cannibalism,” O’Donnell said that the “division” in the Republican Party “that remained even after the primary I think did hurt us.”

She added that it also didn’t help that the “Delaware GOP leadership, in their attempt to win the primary, they filed a fake FEC complaint against us that was totally baseless,” but they never withdrew it.

watch